Investigating the Implementation of an Online Literacy Coaching Program for Junior High School English Teacher


  • Siti Hanna Sumedi Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ilza Mayuni Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Siti Drivoka Sulistyaningrum Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia



literacy coaching; teacher professional development; literacy teaching


Literacy coaching is an in-depth style of literacy enrichment and professional development activity that links observation, feedback, and reflection to the practice. This study adopted a case study to investigate the implementation, process, and benefits of an online literacy coaching program for 32 junior high school English teachers across Indonesia. Observation protocol recorded sessions, and participants were the data sources of this study. As observed thus analyzed through content analysis, it was found that the implementation of online literacy coaching has fulfilled the core activities of literacy coaching cycles as it adopts a collaborative, reflective, and project-based approach. In further, the process of literacy coaching has improved the participants' literacy teaching as their performance in Cycle 2 was getting better than in Cycle 1. Moreover, the interview and questionnaire results showed that the implementation of Online Literacy Coaching improved the participants' literacy skills and pedagogy. Based on the findings, this study proposed recommendations to properly emphasize the time duration of each session, intensively establish digital literacy even further, and intentionally involve students’ feedback as valuable and beneficial input for teachers’ professional development and the process of online literacy coaching.


Download data is not yet available.


Ahmadi, A., & Yulianto, B. (2017). Descriptive-analytical studies of literacy movement in Indonesia, 2003-2017. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 4(3), 16–24.

Asesmen Kompetensi Siswa Indonesia (AKSI)/ Indonesia National Assessment Programme (INAP). (2016).

Barza, L., & von Suchodoletz, A. (2016). Home literacy as cultural transmission: Parent preferences for shared reading in the United Arab Emirates. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 11, 142–152.

Bean, R. M., Kern, D., Goatley, V., Ortlieb, E., Shettel, J., Calo, K., Marinak, B., Sturtevant, E., Elish-Piper, L., L’Allier, S., Cox, M. A., Frost, S., Mason, P., Quatroche, D., & Cassidy, J. (2015). Specialized literacy professionals as literacy leaders: Results of a national survey. Literacy Research and Instruction, 54(2), 83–114.

Bekker, T., Bakker, S., Douma, I., van der Poel, J., & Scheltenaar, K. (2015). Teaching children digital literacy through design-based learning with digital toolkits in schools. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, 29–38.

Cooper, K., & White, R. E. (2008). Critical literacy for school improvement: An action research project. Improving Schools, 11(2), 101–113.

Coulthard, G. J. (2016). A descriptive case study: Investigating the implementation of web based, automated grading and tutorial software in a freshman computer literacy course [Purdue University]. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Echevarría, J., & Beach, L. (2011). The SIOP Model: A professional development framework for a comprehensive school-wide intervention. CREATE Brief, November.

Frederick, W. F. (2017). The impact of literacy coaching on teacher efficacy when employing a balanced literacy framework [Gardner-Webb University].

Friedman, A., & Woodhead, S. (2008). Approaches to continuing professional development (CPD) measurement. In Information Paper (Issue June).

Gilmore, D. (2020). Implementing a coaching model for the development of online teachers. International Journal for Academic Development, 00(00), 1–13.

House, M. E. (2017). Literacy coaching: A research based coaching Guide.

Kankaraš, M., Montt, G., Paccagnella, M., Quintini, G., & Thorn, W. (2016). Skills matter: Further results from the survey of adult skills. OECD skills studies. In OECD Publishing.

L’Allier, S., Elish-Piper, L., & Bean, R. M. (2010). What matters for elementary literacy coaching? Guiding principles for instructional improvement and student achievement. The Reading Teacher, 63(7), 544–554.

Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H. E., & Resnick, L. B. (2010). Implementing literacy coaching: The role of school social resources. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(2), 249–272.

Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H. E., & Spybrook, J. (2013). Literacy coaching to improve student reading achievement: A multi-level mediation model. Learning and Instruction, 25, 35–48.

Mayuni, I., Leiliyanti, E., Agustina, N., & Antoro, B. (2020). The praxis of literacy movement in Indonesian context. International Conference on Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, 2020, 897–909.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE Publication, Inc.

Moran, M. C. (2007). Differentiated literacy coaching: Scaffolding for student and teacher success. ASCD.

NCSI. (2014). Effective coaching: Improving teacher practice and outcomes for all learners part 1: General information on coaching.

North, B., Malteva, G., & Rossner, R. (2011). The European profiling grid. ICT for Language Learning, 1–35.

PISA 2015: PISA results in focus. (2018).

Pugh, P. (2017). Early literacy coaching model.

Reichenberg, J. S. (2018). A model of joint action for literacy coaching: The intersection of consonance and dissonance with responsive and directive approaches. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 67(1), 109–130.

Rodgers, A., & Rodgers, E. (2007). The effective literacy coach: Using inquiry to support teaching and learning -. Teacher College Press.

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. 2018 Insights and Interpretations FINAL PDF.pdf

Sunderman, G., & Dahar, T. (2014). Effective online teaching. Annual Graduate Teaching Assistant Workshop, 72(9), 11–19.

Teemant, A., Wink, J., & Tyra, S. (2011). Effects of coaching on teacher use of sociocultural instructional practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 683–693.

Toll, C. A. (2017). A problem-solving model for literacy coaching practice. Reading Teacher, 70(4), 413–421.

Walpole, S., & McKenna, M. C. (2004). The literacy coach’s handbook: A guide to research-based practice. Guilford Press.

Walsh, M., Matsumura, L. C., Zook-Howell, D., Correnti, R., & DiPrima Bickel, D. (2020). Video-based literacy coaching to develop teachers’ professional vision for dialogic classroom text discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 103001.

Wandasari, Y., Kristiawan, M., & Arafat, Y. (2019). Policy evaluation of school’s literacy movement on improving discipline of state high school students. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(4), 190–198.

World’s most literate nations. (2016). Central Connecticut State University.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and method. SAGE Publications Ltd.




How to Cite

Sumedi, S. H., Mayuni, I. ., & Sulistyaningrum, S. D. . (2022). Investigating the Implementation of an Online Literacy Coaching Program for Junior High School English Teacher. NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 13(1), 117–137.