Reasons behind Students' Silence to Teacher's Directive Utterances: A Case Study on A Lower Secondary School in Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Alfi Azizah Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Suparno Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Slamet Supriyadi Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2022.13.2.254-270

Keywords:

classroom interaction, directive utterances, reasons, students' responses

Abstract

Classroom interaction is identified to reach students’ participation in responding and interacting with teacher and other students. However, one problem that usually interferes teacher-student interaction is unpredictable students’ reactions in interpreting teacher’s utterances. The students’ reactions are influenced by some variables which contribute to their reasons in responding to teacher’s utterances. The present research aimed to investigate several reasons of students’ responses to teacher’s directive utterances. To reach the objective, a case study was applied. Three eight-grade students in a Yogyakarta lower secondary school were selected purposively to participate in this study. The data were collected through observation and interviews. Meanwhile, the data analysis was based on Miles’ interactive model. The results of this study show that internal and external variables affect the students’ responses during English classes. Having a lack of vocabulary and use of guessing are the internal variables to understand the teacher’s intention. Meanwhile, unfavorable classroom atmospheres resulted from noisy students, noisy next-door class, and noisy vehicles outside are the external variables that disturbed the students’ attention and understanding of the teacher’s directive utterances. The results of this research reveal significant implications on students’ attitudes, as they rarely develop their interaction due to internal and external factors. Thus, the condition requires teacher’s role as active language users.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Suparno, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

A lecturer in English Education Department Graduate program and Undergraduate program who interests on linguistics study.

Slamet Supriyadi, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

A lecturer in Fine Arts Education of Undergraduate Program and English Education of Graduate Program who interests on linguistics and arts and culture research.

References

Alqahtani, M. (2015). The Importance of Vocabulary in Language Learning and How to be Taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, III (3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.20472/te.2015.3.3.002

Ambarwati, M. D. (2019). Students ’ Responses Towards Teacher Talk. RETAIN, 7(3), 93–100.Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (Eighth). Wadsworth.

Bahing, Emzir, & Rafli, Z. (2018). English Speech Acts of Illocutionary Force in Class Interaction. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(3), 113–120.

Baihaqi, A., Wilian, S., & Nuriadi, N. (2019). The Influence of Classroom Learning Environment toward Students’ Vocabulary Acquisition: A Study on Second Semester Junior High School Students. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(2), 710–719. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i2.762

Basra, S. M., & Thoyyibah, L. (2017). A Speech Act Analysis of Teacher Talk in An EFL Classroom. International Journal of Education, 10(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v10i1.6848

Bennett, J. (1975). Stimulus, Response, Meaning. In N. Rescher (Ed.), American Philosophical Quarterly monograph (First Edit, Issue 9, pp. 55–88). Blackwell; First Edition.

Bezemer, J. (2008). Displaying Orientation in the Classroom: Students’ Multimodal Responses to Teacher Instructions. Linguistics and Education, 19(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.05.005

Bostrom, R. N. (1996). Memory, Cognitive Processing, and the Process of “Listening” A Reply to Thomas and Levine. Human Communication Research, 23(2), 298–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00396.x

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principles, Second Edition. In Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy.

Budiasih, L. T. (2018). Illocution on Speech Acts of Foreign Students in Indonesian Learning. PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education, 6(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v6i2.41-48

Cambridge University Press (n.d). Response (Def. 2). In Cambridge Online Dictionary. Retrieved June 18. 2021, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/response

Celce-Murcia, M. (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Christianto, D. (2020). Speech Acts in EFL Classrooms. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 2(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v2i1.68-79

Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology, 29(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02766777

Hannah, R. (2013). The Effect of Classroom Environment on Student Learning. Honors Theses. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses/2375

Heriansyah, H. (2012). Speaking Problems Faced by The English Departement Students of Syiah Kuala University. Lingua Didaktika, 6(1), 37–44.

Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics Fourth Edition (Fourth Edi). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.2307/329116

Hussein, N. O., Albakri, I. S. M. A., & Seng, G. H. (2019). Pragmatic Competence and Activity-Based Language Teaching:

Importance of Teaching Communicative Functions in Iraq EFL Context. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 4(6), 1655–1660. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.46.5

Ingram, J., & Elliott, V. (2016). A Critical Analysis of the Role of Wait Time in Classroom Interactions and the Effects on Student and Teacher Interactional Behaviours.Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1009365

Khan, A., Khan, S., Zia-Ul-Islam, S., & Khan, M. (2017). Communication Skills of A Teacher and Its Role in the Development of the Students’ Academic Success. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 18–21.

Koch, A. B. (2017). Sounds of Education: Teacher Role and Use of Voice in Interactions with Young Children. International Journal of Early Childhood, 49(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-017-0184-6

Kreidler, C. W. (2002). Introducing English Semantics. Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315886428

McDuffie, A. (2013). Verbal Communication. In F. R. Volkmar (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders (p. 3240). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Moskowitz, G. (1971). New Modern Language for Supervisors Interaction Analvsis-A. 1(March 1968).

Noor, N. M., Aman, I., Mustaffa, R., & Seong, T. K. (2010). Teacher’s Verbal Feedback on Students’ Response: A Malaysian ESL classroom discourse analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.054

Pease, A., & Pease, B. (2004). The Definitive Book of Body Language. McPherson’s Printing Group.

Richmond, V. P., Wrench, J. S., & Gorham, J. (2020). Communication, Affect & Learning in the Classroom (4th editio). Creative Commons A-NC-SA License.

Santosa, A. W., Fauziati, E., & Supriyadi, S. (2021). SPEECH ACT ANALYSIS OF TEACHER TALK IN EFL CLASSROOM. Proceedings International Conference on Education of Suryakancana (Iconnects) 2021, 230–237.

Sari, K. P. (2018). Teacher ’ s Directive Speech Acts at Kindergarten School. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 7(1), 34–44.Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1981). Expression and Meaning Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Seffar, S. (2015). The Effect of Vocabulary Knowledge on EFL Oral Competence. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education Ver. I, 5(6), 2320–7388. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05610813

Singh, A. (2014). Conducive Classroom Environment in Schools. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(1), 387–392.

Songbatumis, A. M. (2017). Challenges in Teaching English Faced by English Teachers at MTsN Taliwang, Indonesia. Journal of Foreign Languange Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.2223

Sudrajat, B. A. N., & Sinta, R. (2016). The Pattern of Teacher Instruction and Function of Student Responses in EFL Classroom. Creativity and Innovation Language Materials Development and Language Teaching Methodology in Asia and Beyond The 63rd TEFLIN International Conference, 274–284.

Suhirman, L. (2016). Speech Act in Psycholinguistics Class Setting in Postgraduate Program. IJOLTL, 1(1), 19–38.

Sumilia, E., Puspita, H., & Elfrida. (2019). Students’ Responses Toward Teachers’ Questions in Senior High School 8 Bengkulu. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy, 3(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTAS.2004.1371634

Sundari, H. (2017). Classroom Interaction in Teaching English as Foreign Language at Lower Secondary Schools in Indonesia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(6), 147. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.6p.147

Yule, G. (1996a). Oxford Introductions to Language Study. Oxford University Press.

Yule, G. (1996b). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Azizah, A., Suparno, & Supriyadi, S. (2022). Reasons behind Students’ Silence to Teacher’s Directive Utterances: A Case Study on A Lower Secondary School in Yogyakarta. NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 13(2), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2022.13.2.254-270

Issue

Section

Articles