William Golding’s Lord of the Flies: A Reconsideration

Authors

  • Mariwan Hasan University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
  • Diman Sharif University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2020.11.2.125-136

Keywords:

allegory, fable, children, symbolism, education & civilization

Abstract

This paper reconsiders William Golding’s Lord of the Flies. Allegorical writings can illustrate ethical, social or psychological and moral issues using the manipulation of images that have stipulated meanings other than their meanings as imitations of the actual world. Allegory has been used widely throughout history in all forms of art, and comprehensible for the reader, conveys hidden meanings through symbolic figures. Lord of the Flies had been written in relation to historical circumstances of the twentieth-century and to the personal experience of William Golding. Also, it has provided a critical analysis of the novel that treated the prominent perspective and elements in it. The novel is a parallel of life in the late twentieth century, while it looks like society a stage of enhancement in technology whereas, human morality is not completely mature yet. “Lord of the Flies is an allegorical microcosm of the world. The destruction of World War II because of the dictators who initiated this war has a profound impact on William Golding himself”. In the beginning, the paper gives an introduction to Golding’s point of view on humanity with the title of how to draw attention to me through allegory and fable, two forms of imaginative literature that encouraged the reader and listener to look for hidden meanings. Then it deals with William Golding’s Lord of the Flies from the cultural approaches of that time, who is one of the most prominent literary men of postmodernism that was famous for utilizing symbolism within the novel; “he used different kinds of symbols, characters, objects, animals, colors and setting to convey his message about his main theme”, in the last section we analyzed the postmodern features in Lord of the Flies and how they are used to depict Golding’s view. The way Golding uses allegory strengthens the symbolism of his novel. Finally, it tackles the educational value through his experiences in teaching along with critical analysis of Golding’s technique.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrams, M.H., Harpham, G.G. (2012). A glossary of literary terms, (10th Ed.). Boston, USA: Wadsworth.

Baker, R.J. (2000) “Golding and Huxley: the fable of demonic possession.” Twentieth Century Literature, 46(3), 311-327. DOI: 10.2307/441940

Barzinji, M.N.H. (2012). The image of modern man in T.S Eliot’s poetry. Bloomington: Author House.

Bloom, H. (Ed.). (2008). William Golding’s Lord of the Flies. New York: Bloom Literary Criticism.

Chaima, S. (2015). Symbolism in William Golding’s Novel Lord of the Flies (1954). Doctoral dissertation (University Of Mohamed Kheider Biskra).

Monks, M.M., & Pistolis, D.R. (1996). Hit list: Frequently challenged books for young adults. Chicago: American Library Association.

Golding, W. (1986). Lord of the flies: London, Faber.

Hasan, M. (2016) “The rise of modernism: a new history of Western modernism.” Journal of Kirkuk University Humanity Studies, 11(1), 1-42. Retrieved from: https://www.iasj.net/iasj?func=article&aId=130559

Hasan, M.N. (2015). The eighteenth century and the rise of the English novel. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 3(2), 18-21. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijla.20150302.12

Hawlin, S. (2008). The Savages in the Forest: Decolonising William Golding. In H. Bloom (Ed.). William Golding’s Lord of the Flies. New York: Bloom Literary Criticism.

Ichiko, T. (2000). Fable, parable, and allegory. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/art/fable-parable-and-allegory/Allegorical-literature-in-the-East

Keating, J. (1979). Interview with William Golding. London: The Macmillan Press.

Kelly, C. (2007). Children’s world: growing up in Russia, 1890-1991. Yale University Press.

Kennedy, W. (1991). The modern allegories of William Golding. USA: University of South Florida.

Michot, P. (1990). “The Myth of Innocence” in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.

Oldsey, B.S., & Weintraub, S. (1998). The Art of William Golding. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.

Olsen, K. (2000). Understanding lord of the flies: A student casebook to issues, sources, and historical documents. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Reiff, R.H. (2010). William Golding: Lord of the Flies. Tarrytown, NY: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark.

Reilly, P. (1988). The literature of guilt: from ‘Gulliver’ to Golding. Iowa: University of Iowa Press.

Roy, P.A. (2003). Boys’ Club—No Girls Allowed: Absence as Presence in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies (1954). In J. Fisher & E.S. Silber (Eds.). Women in literature: reading through the lens of gender. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.

Tiger, V. (2003). William Golding: The Unmoved Target. London: Marion Boyars Publishers.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-29

How to Cite

Hasan, M., & Sharif, D. (2020). William Golding’s Lord of the Flies: A Reconsideration. NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 11(2), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2020.11.2.125-136

Issue

Section

Articles
| Abstract views: 135 ,