Dory's Paradoxical Characterizations in Disney's Animated Feature Film Finding Dory (2016)


  • Artini Ni Nyoman Ganesha University of Education, Bali, Indonesia
  • Suwastini Ni Komang Arie Ganesha University of Education, Bali, Indonesia
  • Utami I.G.A. Lokita Purnamika Ganesha University of Education, Bali, Indonesia



Disney, animation, feature, film


The appearance of Dory, the forgetful blue tang fish, as the main character in Finding Dory (2016), one of Disney’s animated feature films, makes the film popular and has been nominated to 46 awards and won 16 awards. Previously, Dory was a helping character in the original film, Finding Nemo (2003). This study aimed to identify  Dory’s characterizations by using textual analysis to find the uniqueness of Dory in the film. The analysis resulted in Dory’s paradoxical characterization where she was forgetful yet creative, reliant yet independent, and anxious yet confident. These paradoxes implied that this film portrays that negative characters can be developed into good characters. Therefore, this film can be used as media to develop characters in informal education.


Download data is not yet available.


Ajtony, Z. (2012). Britain and britishness in G. B. Shaw’s plays – A linguistic perspective. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.

Althof, W., & Berkowitz, M. W. (2006). Moral education and character education: Their relationship and roles in citizenship education. Journal of Moral Education 35(4):495-518.

Bordwell, D., Thompson, K. (2008). Film art: An introduction (8th Ed.). London: McGraw Hill.

Donofrio, E. C. (2013). The wonderful world of gender roles: A look at recent Disney children ’ s films [Honors Thesis, Boston College University]. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation.

Dwipayani, N. L. (2018). Character education on the main character of Zootopia [Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. Ganesha University of Education.

Fletcher, Je., & Olwyler, K. (1997). How to profit from your reputation. Forbes.

Given, L. M. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Halvatzis, S. (2018). How to write paradoxical characters. Stavros Halvatzis. Retrieved September 7, 2019 from

Hartini, S. (2017). Pendidikan karakter disiplin siswa di era modern sinergi orang tua dan guru di MTs Negeri Kabupaten Klaten. Al-Asasiyya: Journal Basic Of Education, 02(02), 38–59. 10.24269/ajbe.v2i1.882

Hasanah, N. (2017, October). Peran orang tua dalam pendidikan karakter anak usia dini melalui ranah afektif. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Tahunan Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. 1(1), 371–374.

Klinowski, S. (2017). Finding Nemo, Finding Dory, finding ourselves?: How and why we teach our children to think about disability [Master's thesis, University at Albany, State University of New York]. University at Albany, State University of New York Scholars Archive.

Koesnosoebroto, S. B. (1988). The anatomy of prose fiction. Jakarta: Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan

Levin, N. (2012). “I am Heathcliff!” Paradoxical love in Brontë’s Wuthering Heights [Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Literature and History of Ideas, Stockholm University.

Luna, A. (2019). 5 Strange examples of paradox in human behavior. LonerWolf. Retrieved September 7, 2019, from

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Mitayani, Y. (2010). Education values in the “Finding Nemo” movie [Undergraduate Thesis, State Islamic Studies Institute of Salatiga]. E-repository IAIN Salatiga.

Rochmawati, W. P. (2016). Analisis nilai-nilai pendidikan karakter dalam film “Film The Miracle Worker" [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik]. E-theses UIN Malang.

Zulhijrah, Z. (2017). Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah. Tadrib, 1(1), 118-136. Retrieved from




How to Cite

Ni Nyoman, A., Ni Komang Arie, S., & I.G.A. Lokita Purnamika, U. (2020). Dory’s Paradoxical Characterizations in Disney’s Animated Feature Film Finding Dory (2016). NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 11(1), 27-37.



| Abstract views: 600 ,