Transitivity Process and Ideological Construction of Donald Trump's Speeches
This research is the collaborative study of Critical Discourse Analysis with the new grammar perspective of Hallidayâ€™s Systemic Functional Linguistics Theory focusing on Transitivity System. It investigates the pattern of transitivity process that reveals the linguistic strategies as well as its ideological construction of Donald Trumpâ€™s speeches in the 45th United States presidential election. The writer mainly utilizes Faircloughâ€™s framework for CDA which consists of three stages of analysis consisting of description, interpretation, and explanation. Under descriptive-qualitative method, this research significantly gives an understanding about how transitivity processes can be used to reveal the ideology. As the result, Donald Trump uses variety language during his speeches. It is because he applies all the types of transitivity process proposed by M.A.K. Halliday which consists of six types: material, mental, relational, behavioral, verbal, and existential. The transitivity processes eventually reveal that Donald Trump attempts to construct democracy view during his speeches.
Anggun, S.K. (2016). An Analysis of Description Text in English Textbook UsingTransitivity System. Journal of English and Education, 4(1), 147-158.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Canada: Wadsworth.
Aslani, M. (2016). Ideological Traces in Political Texts: A CDA Approach Towards News Representation and Translation of Iranâ€™s Nuclear Program in English and Persian Written Media. International Journal of Applied & English Literature, 5(3), 237-246.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. New York: Longman Group.
Fauzan, U. (2014). A CDA of The Ideology of Indonesian TVOne News Report. JurnalIlmiah Bahasa dan Sastra, 1(2), 211-229.
Fikmawati. (2012). An Analysis of Speech Function in the Script of Confession of a Shopaholic Movie By P.J. Hogan. (Thesis, Muria Kudus University).
Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Webster, J. J. (2009). Systemic Functional Linguistics. London:Continuum Companion Publishing Group.
Kaur, K., Arumugam, N., & Yunus, N.M. (2013). Beauty Product Advertisements: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Asian Social Science, 9(3), 61-71.
Khoiriyah, L. (2016). Beauty Concept in Toothpaste Advertisement: A Critical Discourse Analysis. (Thesis, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim).
Kurdali, B. (2012). Systemic Functional Analysis of EFL University Studentsâ€™ Writing Across Disciplines. International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 2(1), 289-295.
Litosseliti, L. (2010). Research Method in Linguistics. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Mohammadi, M. (2017). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trumpâ€™s Language Use in US Presidential Campaign, 2016. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(5), 1-10.
Nazlia. (2016). An Analysis of Transitivity Process and The Schematic Structure of News Item in Selected News of VOA News. (Thesis, Sumatra Utara University).
Nugrawidhanti, D.M.R. (2016). A Critical Discourse Analysis on Oriflame Beauty Product Advertisements. (Thesis, Sanata Dharma University).
Nurohmah, I. (2013). An Analysis of Studentâ€™s Recount Text by Using Systemic Functional Grammar. Passage, 1(2), 89-98.
Oliviera, L.C. (2015). A Systemic-Functional Analysis of English Language Learnersâ€™ Writing. (Thesis, University of Miami).
Ongâ€™onda, N.A. (2016). Transitivity Analysis of Newspaper Headlines on Terrorism Attackin Kenya: A Case Study of Westgate Mall, Nairobi. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(7), 59-70.
Oriza, F.R. (2017). The Depiction of Islamic Princess in Childrenâ€™s Books: A Transitivity Analysis. (Thesis, Universtitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
Patpong, P.J. (2008). Language of Persuasion: An Analysis of Selected Samples from Talisman Advertisements. Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication, 29, 633-664.
Rollins, A.J. (2012). Systemic Functional Linguistic Discourse Features in the Personal Essay. (Thesis, Marshall University).
Salsabil, Silvi. (2014). A Transitivity Analysis of English Texts in Bahasa Inggris When English Ring the Bell. (Thesis, Yogyakarta State University).
Sargent, L.T. (1981). Contemporary Political Ideology. Illinois: The Dorsey Press.
Setiawan, W. (2015). An Analysis of Speech Function on Monsters University Movie Script By Dan Scanlon, Daniel Gerson, and Robert L. Baird. (Thesis, Muria Kudus University).
Sipra, M.A. & Rashid, A. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis of Martin Luther Kingâ€™s Speech in Socio-Political Perspective. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 4(1), 27-33.
Viana, T.N. (2013). Mood and Speech Function in â€œToy Story 3â€ Movie Script by Michael Arndt. (Thesis, Muria Kudus University).
Viscido, Francesca. (2014). Any Port in a Storm: A Systemic Functional Analysis of Linguistic Choices of Representation in News Text. (Thesis, University of Tampere).
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2001). Method of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
Zhang, X. (2013). The Third U.S. â€“China Strategic and Economic Dialogue: A Contrastive Study of Chinese and American Newspaper News Reporting. (Thesis, University of Florida).
Zhang, Y. (2017). Transitivity Analysis of Hillary Clintonâ€™s and Donald Trumpâ€™s First Television Debate. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(7), 65-72.
Copyright (c) 2018 NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.